S07 - Session P1 - Hydrological efficiency of established rain gardens and plant adaptability to their soil water conditions

S07 - Session P1 - Hydrological efficiency of established rain gardens and plant adaptability to their soil water conditions

Tuesday, August 16, 2022 2:25 PM to 2:30 PM · 5 min. (Europe/Paris)
Angers Congress Centre
S07 II International symposium on greener cities: improving ecosystem services in a climate-changing world (greencities2022)

Information

Authors: GiamPaolo Zanin *, Lucia Bortolini

The continue and progressive increase in impervious surfaces due to urbanization together with the undeniable climate change effects result in overloads of drainage systems and temporary flooding. To overcome these problems, rain gardens (RGs) and other bioretention systems were proposed to restore the natural water cycle improving infiltration of rainwater runoff from paved surfaces. In spring 2011, at the Agripolis Campus of the University of Padova (north-eastern Italy), a system of two RGs was designed and implemented to receive and manage the stormwater runoff from a building roof. The two rain gardens have a circular shape and an area of 10.5 and 21 m 2 , corresponding respectively to 10% and 20% of the roof drainage area. In spring 2018 the plants were changed and RGs were both vegetated with five herbaceous ornamental perennial species: Echinacea purpurea 'Magnus', Iris spuria , Panicum virgatum 'Cardinal', Rudbeckia fulgida 'Goldsturm', Salvia ×sylvestris 'Mainacht'. Plants were transplanted at different distances from the centre of each RG to assess their suitability to the different soil water conditions, normally wetter moving from the perimeter to the deepest surface of the centre. The efficiency of the two rain gardens to manage stormwater runoff and the aesthetical and the growth response were evaluated. The results showed that both RGs were able to manage 99.9% and 98.0% of the stormwater runoff (large and small RG, respectively), almost all of which by infiltration and a small part (2.1% and 3.9%, respectively) by evapotranspiration. As for the vegetation, all the species showed good aesthetic values over a long period of time. The growth of the plants was influenced by their position in the rain gardens (i.e. different soil water content). In particular, E. purpurea , I. spuria , R. fulgida , and P. virgatum , showed better performances in the inner wetter position, while S. ×sylvestris in the outer, drier locations of the rain garden.

Type of sessions
Eposter Flash Presentation
Type of broadcast
In person
Keywords
Green infrastructuresplant responsestormwater managementSuDs
Room
Cointreau Room - Screen 1

Log in